Apr 19 2009

Aaj Tu Be Sabab Udaas Hai Jee

Aaj Tu Be Sabab Udaas Hai Jee
Ishq Hota Tu Koi Baat Bhi Thi

Jalta Phirta Hoon Kyon Dupehron Main
Jaane Kya Cheez Kho Gayi Hai Meri

Vahin Phirta Hoon Main Bhi Khaak-ba-Sar
Is Bhare Sheher Main Hai Ik Galii
Chupta Phirta Hai Ishq Dunya Se 
Phailti Jaati Hai Rusvaaii

Hamnasheen Kya Kahoon Ke Woh Kya Hai
Chor Ye Baat Neend Urnay Lagi 

Aaj Tu Woh Bhi Kuch Khaamosh Sa Tha
Main Ne Bhi Us Se Koi Baat Na Ki
Ek Dam Us Ke Haath Choom Liye
Ye Mujhe Baithe Baithe Kya Soojhi

Tu Jo Itna Udaas Hai Nasir
Tujhe Kya Ho Gaya Bata Tu Sahi

Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Feb 06 2009

LSE Lecture: Here Comes Everybody

Photo-0036 On Tuesday I got the chance to attend a lecture at the London School of Economics. They have free public lectures for anyone who might be interested in those topics. This time it was Clay Shirky, author of Here Comes Everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. His thesis was that the new social networking technologies, such as facebook, have empowered people to cooperate and organize themselves without elaborate hierarchies and structures and unleash their collective power to make the change they want.

He started by recounting the examples of Chinese earthquake a few years back and the HSBC’s friendly scam to extract money from its student account holders. China would have gotten away with not reporting the level of destruction in the earthquake and the faulty construction that lead to all the casualties and HSBC would have gotten away with charging people for something that they initially stated they wouldn’t. Both were relying on the difficulty of organizing a collective action. In both cases people used social networking tools such as facebook , twitter and video sharing sites to immediately share information with the world and stop governments or organizations from controlling and manipulating them.

image This wouldn’t be the first book highlighting the ability of new technologies belonging to the Web 2.0 wave to transform society and bring the “power of the people” to internet. Wikipedia, a great example of collaborative effort that has brought about and impossible amount of information in one place for reference and not only reference but highlighting all kinds of views regarding it. Facebook allowed people to network and share information and interests. Youtube allowed people to share videos and rate the most interesting up from the least. Digg, Reddit, Delicious allowed collaborative link sharing. They keywords being sharing, collaboration and then action.

History is full of examples where the power of people has transformed the circumstance to suit their wants and needs. If the people want it enough, they get it. All these examples in history have been revolutionary ones, the modern society can’t handle it anymore. So it has come up with a evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, version of power of people called, Democracy. The Web 2.0 wave represents the same, democratization of the web.

In all these discussion I have noticed that people get too carried away and create unrealistic expectations from technology and its ability to impact situation. At the end of the day, it is the will of the people that transforms not technology. Technology is just an enabler. Clay mentioned that initially he too got carried away and promoted these ideas with religious zeal but with time he better understood its potentials and limitations.

An interesting example came up during the presentation where the campaign group of President Obama setup a website and asked people to tell them what their priorities are for him to deliver. Guess what came up #1? Legalized marijuana! This demonstrates the fallibility of the crowd intelligence. To a great degree people do possess the power to decide what's right and what’s wrong but they are also prone to whims and weakness and can easily go into the ‘sheep’ mode of thinking. It also exposes the weakness of the system as an anonymous internet can be fooled and a ‘bunch of pot-heads can game the system’.

Still these technologies cannot be ignored in the modern world and they have proved themselves as highly transformative. Let’s see what future brings.

Currently rated 3.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jan 20 2009

Wahdat-ul-Wujood: The idea that poisoned Islamic spirituality

Each image painted on the canvas of existence
is the form of the Artist himself
Eternal Ocean spews forth-new waves.
Waves we call them; but there is only the sea.

image Every time you hear in a Sufi poetry something that talks about God being every where or one seeing God in everything or being inside oneself or being hidden and visible at the same time, be afraid, be very very afraid. For you are being fed something that seems so beautiful and so pure and so innocent, yet is something that can tear the very fabric of Iman that Quran worked very hard to teach. I am hardly the person with any knowledge or position to name names but as a conscientious Muslim I must oppose this idea and anyone who spreads it. This disease has spread through majority, and when I say that I mean Majority, of the Sufi sects and followers out there. Its enchantment deceived a few and their unquestionable following preserved it for eternity. 

If there has been one crime that humanity has committed since its beginning, its Shirk, it is mixing God with the things that aren't worthy of being God and worship.

LA ILLAHA ILLALLAH (Nothing worthy of worship except God)

This is the creed that makes you a Muslim. Notice the wording, Ilah in Arabic means something that is worthy of worship, not just a god, but that which should be worshiped. God is careful to tell you that he wants undivided and exclusive rights on being worshiped. This must not be shared with anyone or anything. Full Stop. If you do that you will incur the worst wrath of God.

If anything Satan has always been mindful of this fact and has understood it well. He knows that to keep human beings in God's perpetual wrath, he must deviate them from this fundamental principle. He must make every effort to confuse and convolute this idea and cause them to deviate from the unity and exclusiveness of worship to God. He has succeeded many many times and continues to do so.

Wahdat ul Wajood means that there is 'nothing except God', not that there is nothing worthy of worship except God, but 'nothing except God'. Mushrikeen in the time of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) were not Christians or Jews, but pagans, those who worshiped nature and believed that everything was God and God was in everything. Hence everything became worthy of worship and everything gained some place in the hierarchy of worship. If the ultimate was God, that needed to be worshiped, then He was manifest in everything and part of everything and hence could be worshiped through things or idols or people for that matter. God was everywhere, not metaphorically but literally.

Unfortunately this idea suffers from the same malaise. I have read many arguments regarding how these things are not the same, but they are, when you boil them down to their essence. There will be a lot of confusing philosophizing and layers and layers of reasoning to justify that it is different but the more complex it gets, the simpler the answer becomes, they are the same.

The beauty of truth is in its simplicity. When people go to lengths to prove that something as simple as Tawheed is not that simple, beware that something is wrong. Allah said that he has made the Quran simple and He gives examples so that people may understand. But people are hell bent on making it complex and beyond understanding just so that they can push their faulty ideas and not to have to change.

If you'll bear with me, I will state the explanation given by people (mostly Sufis) on how these things are different. It is a 'causal' relationship. God being the first cause. The idea is that God has existed forever and everything else exists because God exists. Hence everything's existence is causally dependent on God. So, to the keen eye (replace Sufi who has reached Irfaan) everything becomes transparent and even non-existent because it is hardly there on its own. Hence the only thing there is God. My only objection is, why doesn't God say so in the first place? Because he does not. This is a very tricky escape from the pantheistic (pagans) unity. It takes you to the level of mental unity from physical one of the pagan's. But if you ask the simple question, Is there 'anything' beside God? (notice it is anything and not something God like or worship worthy) The answer comes No from them! Why then should I buy the imaginative causal unity?

People (Sufi followers) object that this is a misunderstanding and it arises because one has tried to understand this concept without a Murshid or teacher. Well the Truth (Haq) should sustain, like God, on its own accord without someone making it the truth! The fundamental problem with saying that someone will establish that truth is that someone will establish THEIR truth. Once you make the assumption that you need someone for it, it stops being objective. You find yourself trapped in the vicious circle, that to find the truth you must accept someone but to accept someone you must know if they are true! Hence you already sacrificed all objectivity and sealed your fate that if wrong you will stay wrong forever and that's how all bad ideas ensure their survival. If they open themselves to question and objective reasoning they don't stand a chance. God Himself did not ask you to just believe in Him, but to be reasonable and look around and decide if it this is mere Coincidence!

2:164 (Asad) Verily, in the creation of the heavens and of the earth, and the succession of night and day: and in the ships that speed through the sea with what is useful to man: and in the waters which God sends down from the sky, giving life thereby to the earth after it had, been lifeless, and causing all manner of living creatures to multiply thereon: and in the change of the winds, and the clouds that run their appointed courses between sky and earth: [in all this] there are messages indeed for people who use their reason.

52:35 (Y. Ali) Were they created of nothing, or were they themselves the creators?

Secondly, it is said that it is a matter of experiencing rather than knowing by learning. Well then my question would be, what established guarantees do you have from God regarding your experiences and their interpretation? None, zero, zilch! Experiencing God may definitely bring its own enlightenment and amplification of Iman but as far as knowing the Truth is concerned, it ends where God tells you what it is! And if you say that God told you the truth, then unfortunately I don't have the permission to take this truth from anyone except the Prophets that God chose for the purpose. Especially when I was told that today the religion has been made complete and chosen for me!

It is such a sad fact that the mesmerizing and enchanting beauty of the idea of being one with God has blinded people form He actually asked. He never said we could have the knowledge to know who God really is. If we could ever do that then we would need at least as much knowledge as He Himself, which unfortunately is not possible. Then why run after things that he has not made for us? Why burden yourself with this? He asked Iblis to do something and Iblis declined based on his own knowledge and reasoning, rather than obeying God as He ASKED. With things that God would like to burden us he has left for us to find. But with things he does not need our efforts He has explained on His own and asked us to stick to it! Angels made the same mistake of splitting hairs on what God had specified but apologized immediately:

2:30 (Asad) AND LO! Thy Sustainer said unto the angels: "Behold, I am about to establish upon earth one who shall inherit it." They said: "Wilt Thou place on it such as will spread corruption thereon and shed blood -whereas it is we who extol Thy limitless glory, and praise Thee, and hallow Thy name?" [God] answered: "Verily, I know that which you do not know."

I would like to leave you with words of God, where He clearly says that there is He the creator and others the created. It is only He that deserves worship, but as far as existence goes, there are many. So please stick to that and be as spiritual as you like.

10:3 (Asad) VERILY, your Sustainer is God, who has created the heavens and the earth in six aeons, and is established on the throne of His almightiness, [6] governing all that exists. There is none that could intercede with Him unless He grants leave therefor. [7] Thus is God, your Sustainer: worship, therefore, Him [alone]: will you not, then, keep this in mind?

For God knows best.

 

Further study:

Sufi Metaphysics

What is unity of being

Ibn e Arabi

Ibn e Taymiyya

Wahdat al-Wujud: a fundamental doctrine in Sufism

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dec 29 2008

Ik din bhi agar apni tanhai sey darr jaata

Main umr kay rastay main chup chaap bikhar jaata
ik din bhi agar apni tanhai sey darr jaata


main tark-e-taalluq par zindah hoon so mujrim hoon
kaash us kay leay jeeta apnay leay mar jaata


us raat koi khushboo qurbat main naheen jaagi
main warna sanwar jaata aur woh bhi nikhar jaata


us jaan-e-takallum ko tum mujh sey tou milwaatay
taskheer na kar paata, hairaan tou kar jaata


kal saamnay manzil thi peechhay miri aawazain
chalta tou bichad jaata, rukta tou safar jaata


main shehr ki raunaq main gum ho kay bohat khush tha
ik shaam bacha leta ik rouz tou ghar jaata


mehroom fazaaon main, maayoos nazaaron main
tum azm naheen thehray, main kaisay thehar jaata.


(azm behzad)

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dec 21 2008

Review: Seven Pounds

imageWill Smith has lately chosen very different and demanding roles for himself. From Ali, Pursuit of Hapyness to I am Legend and now Seven Pounds. Correctly portraying any of these roles requires that he looks very closely into the character and then molds himself into it, to accurately deliver it.

Even though the movie is not very powerful and engaging on its own, I attribute it primarily to the director, but Will Smith's acting and the revealing of the secret at the end makes it interesting to watch.

Will Smith has once again done this dark and tragic role where the character is suffering under some strong emotion, for example, loneliness in I am Legend, failure in Hancock and guilt in Seven Pounds. In every case the feeling drives him to extreme actions and that is where the twist is in this movie.

The view rating on IMDB is quite good at around 7.6, while the critics rating at Rotten Tomatoes is quite poor at 28%. This correctly represents the weaknesses and strengths of the movie. In its story telling and ability to engage the viewer it fails but succeeds in delivering a strong emotional performance and unexpected ending.

Seven Pounds

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5